← All benchmarks

Multilingual AI benchmarks

Reasoning in languages other than English.

MGSM

Grade-school maths word problems translated into 10 languages, testing reasoning outside English.

Run by Vals AI (benchmark by Google Research). Leaderboard as of 9 Jan 2026 · retrieved 21 Oct 2026. Showing top 25 of 75 models listed.

  • Anthropic
  • OpenAI
  • Google
  • Meta
  • DeepSeek
  • Alibaba
MGSM: top 15 by AccuracyRanked bars. Leader: Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking) at 95.20%. Full values in the table below.0%20%40%60%80%100%Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking) (Anthropic): 95.20%AClaude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)95.20%Claude Opus 4.5 (Nonthinking) (Anthropic): 94.76%AClaude Opus 4.5 (Nonthinking)94.76%Claude Opus 4.1 (Thinking) (Anthropic): 94.44%AClaude Opus 4.1 (Thinking)94.44%Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking) (Anthropic): 94.33%AClaude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)94.33%Claude Opus 4.1 (Nonthinking) (Anthropic): 94.22%AClaude Opus 4.1 (Nonthinking)94.22%GPT 5.2 (OpenAI): 94.00%OGPT 5.294.00%Gemini 3 Pro (11/25) (Google): 93.93%GGemini 3 Pro (11/25)93.93%Claude Opus 4 (Nonthinking) (Anthropic): 93.78%AClaude Opus 4 (Nonthinking)93.78%o4 Mini (OpenAI): 93.42%Oo4 Mini93.42%Gemini 3 Flash (12/25) (Google): 93.31%GGemini 3 Flash (12/25)93.31%Claude Sonnet 4 (Nonthinking) (Anthropic): 93.02%AClaude Sonnet 4 (Nonthinking)93.02%GPT 5.1 (OpenAI): 92.98%OGPT 5.192.98%Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Thinking) (Anthropic): 92.98%AClaude 3.7 Sonnet (Thinking)92.98%GPT 5 (OpenAI): 92.84%OGPT 592.84%Claude 3.5 Sonnet Latest (Anthropic): 92.58%AClaude 3.5 Sonnet Latest92.58%
Accuracy
Share of problems answered correctly, averaged across languages.

Last updated by Vals in January 2026, so newer models are missing.

MGSM scores
RankModelProviderAccuracyPrice in / out ($/1M tokens)
1 Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)Anthropic95.20%$5 / $25
2 Claude Opus 4.5 (Nonthinking)Anthropic94.76%$5 / $25
3 Claude Opus 4.1 (Thinking)Anthropic94.44%$15 / $75
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)Anthropic94.33%$3 / $15
5 Claude Opus 4.1 (Nonthinking)Anthropic94.22%$15 / $75
6 GPT 5.2OpenAI94.00%$1.75 / $14
7 Gemini 3 Pro (11/25)Google93.93%$2 / $12
8 Claude Opus 4 (Nonthinking)Anthropic93.78%$15 / $75
9 o4 MiniOpenAI93.42%$1.1 / $4.4
10 Gemini 3 Flash (12/25)Google93.31%$0.5 / $3
Show 15 more rows
RankModelProviderAccuracyPrice in / out ($/1M tokens)
11 Claude Sonnet 4 (Nonthinking)Anthropic93.02%$3 / $15
12 GPT 5.1OpenAI92.98%$1.25 / $10
13 Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Thinking)Anthropic92.98%$3 / $15
14 GPT 5OpenAI92.84%$1.25 / $10
15 Claude 3.5 Sonnet LatestAnthropic92.58%$3 / $15
16 GPT 5 MiniOpenAI92.58%$0.25 / $2
17 Qwen 3 (235B)Alibaba92.47%$0.22 / $0.88
18 Llama 4 MaverickMeta92.44%$0.22 / $0.88
19 Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Nonthinking)Anthropic92.40%$3 / $15
20 DeepSeek R1DeepSeek92.25%$1.35 / $5.4
21 Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking)Anthropic92.15%$1 / $5
22 DeepSeek V3DeepSeek92.15%$0.9 / $0.9
23 Qwen 3 Max PreviewAlibaba92.15%$1.2 / $6
24 GPT OSS 120BOpenAI92.04%$0.15 / $0.6
25 Qwen 3 MaxAlibaba91.82%$1.2 / $6

Source: Vals AI leaderboard ↗

Top model here: Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking) (Anthropic). Try prompts for Claude →

ChatJudge does not run these tests. Scores are copied as published by each source, with a link and the date we read them, and only change when we refresh from the source. Different leaderboards use different settings, so compare models within one chart, not across charts. Spotted a mistake? Tell us.