← Finance benchmarks

CorpFin v2 leaderboard (Aug 2026): AI model scores

As of 12 Aug 2026, the highest reported Anthropic score on CorpFin v2 is Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) at 73.19%, #1 on that leaderboard, per Vals AI. The source no longer updates this leaderboard.

What it measures

Understanding long-context credit agreements (private benchmark).

Questions about long credit agreements, testing understanding of long financial documents.

What the score means

Accuracy

Share of questions answered correctly.

Results from published AI leaderboards. Compare models within each benchmark; scores from different tests aren’t directly comparable. How we collect these results

Scores by model

Run by Vals AI. Leaderboard dated 12 Aug 2026 (no longer updated by the source). Last checked 22 Oct 2026. Showing top 25 of 134 models listed.

Highlight a provider: Anthropic OpenAI Google xAI Meta Alibaba Z.ai Moonshot MiniMax

Highlighting Anthropic models. Other providers are dimmed. Show all providers

  • Anthropic
  • OpenAI
  • Google
  • xAI
  • Meta
  • Alibaba
  • Z.ai
  • Moonshot
  • MiniMax
  • Other
CorpFin v2: top 15 by AccuracyBars from zero. Leader: Claude Opus 5 at 73.19%. Anthropic models highlighted. Full values in the table below.0%20%40%60%80%Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic), rank 1: 73.19%AClaude Opus 573.19%Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic), rank 2: 71.83%AClaude Fable 571.83%Kimi K3 (Moonshot), rank 3: 71.56%KKimi K371.56%Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta), rank 4: 71.29%MMuse Spark 1.171.29%Muse Spark 1.2 (Meta), rank 5: 70.94%MMuse Spark 1.270.94%Inkling Small (Other), rank 6: 69.62%·Inkling Small69.62%Inkling (Other), rank 7: 68.57%·Inkling68.57%Grok 4.3 (xAI), rank 8: 68.53%XGrok 4.368.53%GPT 5.5 (OpenAI), rank 9: 68.42%OGPT 5.568.42%Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot), rank 10: 68.26%KKimi K2.568.26%MiniMax-M3 (MiniMax), rank 11: 68.10%MMMiniMax-M368.10%Qwen 3 Max Thinking (Alibaba), rank 12: 68.03%QQwen 3 Max Thinking68.03%Grok 4.5 (xAI), rank 13: 67.41%XGrok 4.567.41%Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking) (Anthropic), rank 14: 67.02%AClaude Opus 4.667.02%Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic), rank 15: 66.98%AClaude Sonnet 566.98%Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic), rank 18: 66.71%A#18 Claude Opus 4.866.71%Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic), rank 23: 66.08%A#23 Claude Opus 4.766.08%
CorpFin v2: top 12 by AccuracyBars from zero. Leader: Claude Opus 5 at 73.19%. Anthropic models highlighted. Full values in the table below.0%25%50%75%Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic), rank 1: 73.19%AClaude Opus 573.19%Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic), rank 2: 71.83%AClaude Fable 571.83%Kimi K3 (Moonshot), rank 3: 71.56%KKimi K371.56%Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta), rank 4: 71.29%MMuse Spark 1.171.29%Muse Spark 1.2 (Meta), rank 5: 70.94%MMuse Spark 1.270.94%Inkling Small (Other), rank 6: 69.62%·Inkling Small69.62%Inkling (Other), rank 7: 68.57%·Inkling68.57%Grok 4.3 (xAI), rank 8: 68.53%XGrok 4.368.53%GPT 5.5 (OpenAI), rank 9: 68.42%OGPT 5.568.42%Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot), rank 10: 68.26%KKimi K2.568.26%MiniMax-M3 (MiniMax), rank 11: 68.10%MMMiniMax-M368.10%Qwen 3 Max Thinking (Alibaba), rank 12: 68.03%QQwen 3 Max Think…68.03%Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking) (Anthropic), rank 14: 67.02%A#14 Claude Opus …67.02%Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic), rank 15: 66.98%A#15 Claude Sonne…66.98%Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic), rank 18: 66.71%A#18 Claude Opus …66.71%
CorpFin v2: top 15 by AccuracyDot plot, axis starting at 60% (not zero). Leader: Claude Opus 5 at 73.19%. Anthropic models highlighted. Full values in the table below.60%65%70%75%ACCURACY · AXIS STARTS AT 60%, NOT ZEROClaude Opus 5 (Anthropic), rank 1: 73.19%AClaude Opus 573.19%Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic), rank 2: 71.83%AClaude Fable 571.83%Kimi K3 (Moonshot), rank 3: 71.56%KKimi K371.56%Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta), rank 4: 71.29%MMuse Spark 1.171.29%Muse Spark 1.2 (Meta), rank 5: 70.94%MMuse Spark 1.270.94%Inkling Small (Other), rank 6: 69.62%·Inkling Small69.62%Inkling (Other), rank 7: 68.57%·Inkling68.57%Grok 4.3 (xAI), rank 8: 68.53%XGrok 4.368.53%GPT 5.5 (OpenAI), rank 9: 68.42%OGPT 5.568.42%Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot), rank 10: 68.26%KKimi K2.568.26%MiniMax-M3 (MiniMax), rank 11: 68.10%MMMiniMax-M368.10%Qwen 3 Max Thinking (Alibaba), rank 12: 68.03%QQwen 3 Max Thinking68.03%Grok 4.5 (xAI), rank 13: 67.41%XGrok 4.567.41%Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking) (Anthropic), rank 14: 67.02%AClaude Opus 4.667.02%Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic), rank 15: 66.98%AClaude Sonnet 566.98%Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic), rank 18: 66.71%A#18 Claude Opus 4.866.71%Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic), rank 23: 66.08%A#23 Claude Opus 4.766.08%
CorpFin v2: top 12 by AccuracyDot plot, axis starting at 60% (not zero). Leader: Claude Opus 5 at 73.19%. Anthropic models highlighted. Full values in the table below.60%65%70%75%AXIS STARTS AT 60%, NOT ZEROClaude Opus 5 (Anthropic), rank 1: 73.19%AClaude Opus 573.19%Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic), rank 2: 71.83%AClaude Fable 571.83%Kimi K3 (Moonshot), rank 3: 71.56%KKimi K371.56%Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta), rank 4: 71.29%MMuse Spark 1.171.29%Muse Spark 1.2 (Meta), rank 5: 70.94%MMuse Spark 1.270.94%Inkling Small (Other), rank 6: 69.62%·Inkling Small69.62%Inkling (Other), rank 7: 68.57%·Inkling68.57%Grok 4.3 (xAI), rank 8: 68.53%XGrok 4.368.53%GPT 5.5 (OpenAI), rank 9: 68.42%OGPT 5.568.42%Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot), rank 10: 68.26%KKimi K2.568.26%MiniMax-M3 (MiniMax), rank 11: 68.10%MMMiniMax-M368.10%Qwen 3 Max Thinking (Alibaba), rank 12: 68.03%QQwen 3 Max Think…68.03%Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking) (Anthropic), rank 14: 67.02%A#14 Claude Opus …67.02%Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic), rank 15: 66.98%A#15 Claude Sonne…66.98%Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic), rank 18: 66.71%A#18 Claude Opus …66.71%
Accuracy
Share of questions answered correctly.

All scores

CorpFin v2 scores, Anthropic models highlighted
RankModelProviderAccuracyPrice in / out ($/1M tokens)
1 Claude Opus 5Anthropic73.19%$5 / $25
2 Claude Fable 5Anthropic71.83%$10 / $50
3 Kimi K3Moonshot71.56%$3 / $15
4 Muse Spark 1.1Meta71.29%$1.25 / $4.25
5 Muse Spark 1.2Meta70.94%$1.25 / $4.25
6 Inkling SmallOther69.62%$0.3 / $1.2
7 InklingOther68.57%$1 / $4.05
8 Grok 4.3xAI68.53%$1.25 / $2.5
9 GPT 5.5OpenAI68.42%$5 / $30
10 Kimi K2.5Moonshot68.26%$0.6 / $3
Show 15 more rows
RankModelProviderAccuracyPrice in / out ($/1M tokens)
11 MiniMax-M3MiniMax68.10%$0.6 / $2.4
12 Qwen 3 Max ThinkingAlibaba68.03%$1.2 / $6
13 Grok 4.5xAI67.41%$2 / $6
14 Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)Anthropic67.02%$5 / $25
15 Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic66.98%$2 / $10
16 Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning)xAI66.90%$0.2 / $0.5
17 Kimi K2.6Moonshot66.74%$0.95 / $4
18 Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic66.71%$5 / $25
19 Qwen 3.6 Max PreviewAlibaba66.47%$1.3 / $7.8
20 Gemini 3 Flash (12/25)Google66.43%$0.5 / $3
21 Grok 4.6xAI66.16%$2 / $6
22 GLM 5.2Z.ai66.12%$1.4 / $4.4
23 Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic66.08%$5 / $25
24 Grok 4xAI66.05%$3 / $15
25 Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)xAI65.97%$0.2 / $0.5

Source: Vals AI leaderboard ↗

Best-ranked Anthropic model here: Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic). Try prompts for Claude →

Prompts for this kind of work

Copy-ready prompts from our library that match what CorpFin v2 tests. Run them on your own material to compare models.