Share promptsSign inExplore benchmarks
← Reasoning & knowledge benchmarks

AIME leaderboard (Apr 2026): AI model scores

As of 16 Apr 2026, the highest reported Anthropic score on AIME is Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic) at 96.25%, #7 on that leaderboard, per Vals AI. The source no longer updates this leaderboard.

What it measures

A challenging national maths exam given to top high-school students.

Problems from the American Invitational Mathematics Examination, a hard high-school maths contest.

What the score means

Accuracy

Share of problems answered correctly.

Results from published AI leaderboards. Compare models within each benchmark; scores from different tests aren’t directly comparable. How we collect these results

Scores by model

Run by Vals AI. Leaderboard dated 16 Apr 2026 (no longer updated by the source). Last checked 22 Oct 2026. Showing top 25 of 96 models listed.

Highlight a provider: Anthropic OpenAI Google xAI Meta Alibaba Z.ai Moonshot

Highlighting Anthropic models. Other providers are dimmed. Show all providers

  • Anthropic
  • OpenAI
  • Google
  • xAI
  • Meta
  • Alibaba
  • Z.ai
  • Moonshot
AIME: top 15 by AccuracyBars from zero. Leader: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (02/26) at 98.13%. Anthropic models highlighted. Full values in the table below.0%20%40%60%80%100%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (02/26) (Google), rank 1: 98.13%GGemini 3.1 Pro Preview98.13%GPT 5.2 (OpenAI), rank 2: 96.88%OGPT 5.296.88%Muse Spark (Meta), rank 3: 96.88%MMuse Spark96.88%Gemini 3 Pro (11/25) (Google), rank 4: 96.68%GGemini 3 Pro96.68%GPT 5.4 (xhigh) (OpenAI), rank 5: 96.67%OGPT 5.496.67%Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) (xAI), rank 6: 96.46%XGrok 4.2096.46%Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic), rank 7: 96.25%AClaude Opus 4.796.25%Gemini 3 Flash (12/25) (Google), rank 8: 95.63%GGemini 3 Flash95.63%Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking) (Anthropic), rank 9: 95.63%AClaude Opus 4.695.63%GPT 5.4 Mini (OpenAI), rank 10: 95.63%OGPT 5.4 Mini95.63%Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot), rank 11: 95.63%KKimi K2.595.63%Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking) (Anthropic), rank 12: 95.42%AClaude Opus 4.595.42%Qwen 3.6 Plus (Alibaba), rank 13: 94.58%QQwen 3.6 Plus94.58%GPT 5 (OpenAI), rank 14: 93.37%OGPT 593.37%GPT 5.1 (OpenAI), rank 15: 93.33%OGPT 5.193.33%Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic), rank 20: 92.29%A#20 Claude Sonnet 4.692.29%
AIME: top 12 by AccuracyBars from zero. Leader: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (02/26) at 98.13%. Anthropic models highlighted. Full values in the table below.0%50%100%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (02/26) (Google), rank 1: 98.13%GGemini 3.1 Pro P…98.13%GPT 5.2 (OpenAI), rank 2: 96.88%OGPT 5.296.88%Muse Spark (Meta), rank 3: 96.88%MMuse Spark96.88%Gemini 3 Pro (11/25) (Google), rank 4: 96.68%GGemini 3 Pro96.68%GPT 5.4 (xhigh) (OpenAI), rank 5: 96.67%OGPT 5.496.67%Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) (xAI), rank 6: 96.46%XGrok 4.2096.46%Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic), rank 7: 96.25%AClaude Opus 4.796.25%Gemini 3 Flash (12/25) (Google), rank 8: 95.63%GGemini 3 Flash95.63%Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking) (Anthropic), rank 9: 95.63%AClaude Opus 4.695.63%GPT 5.4 Mini (OpenAI), rank 10: 95.63%OGPT 5.4 Mini95.63%Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot), rank 11: 95.63%KKimi K2.595.63%Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking) (Anthropic), rank 12: 95.42%AClaude Opus 4.595.42%Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic), rank 20: 92.29%A#20 Claude Sonne…92.29%
AIME: top 15 by AccuracyDot plot, axis starting at 85% (not zero). Leader: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (02/26) at 98.13%. Anthropic models highlighted. Full values in the table below.85%90%95%100%ACCURACY · AXIS STARTS AT 85%, NOT ZEROGemini 3.1 Pro Preview (02/26) (Google), rank 1: 98.13%GGemini 3.1 Pro Preview98.13%GPT 5.2 (OpenAI), rank 2: 96.88%OGPT 5.296.88%Muse Spark (Meta), rank 3: 96.88%MMuse Spark96.88%Gemini 3 Pro (11/25) (Google), rank 4: 96.68%GGemini 3 Pro96.68%GPT 5.4 (xhigh) (OpenAI), rank 5: 96.67%OGPT 5.496.67%Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) (xAI), rank 6: 96.46%XGrok 4.2096.46%Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic), rank 7: 96.25%AClaude Opus 4.796.25%Gemini 3 Flash (12/25) (Google), rank 8: 95.63%GGemini 3 Flash95.63%Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking) (Anthropic), rank 9: 95.63%AClaude Opus 4.695.63%GPT 5.4 Mini (OpenAI), rank 10: 95.63%OGPT 5.4 Mini95.63%Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot), rank 11: 95.63%KKimi K2.595.63%Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking) (Anthropic), rank 12: 95.42%AClaude Opus 4.595.42%Qwen 3.6 Plus (Alibaba), rank 13: 94.58%QQwen 3.6 Plus94.58%GPT 5 (OpenAI), rank 14: 93.37%OGPT 593.37%GPT 5.1 (OpenAI), rank 15: 93.33%OGPT 5.193.33%Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic), rank 20: 92.29%A#20 Claude Sonnet 4.692.29%
AIME: top 12 by AccuracyDot plot, axis starting at 85% (not zero). Leader: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (02/26) at 98.13%. Anthropic models highlighted. Full values in the table below.85%90%95%100%AXIS STARTS AT 85%, NOT ZEROGemini 3.1 Pro Preview (02/26) (Google), rank 1: 98.13%GGemini 3.1 Pro P…98.13%GPT 5.2 (OpenAI), rank 2: 96.88%OGPT 5.296.88%Muse Spark (Meta), rank 3: 96.88%MMuse Spark96.88%Gemini 3 Pro (11/25) (Google), rank 4: 96.68%GGemini 3 Pro96.68%GPT 5.4 (xhigh) (OpenAI), rank 5: 96.67%OGPT 5.496.67%Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) (xAI), rank 6: 96.46%XGrok 4.2096.46%Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic), rank 7: 96.25%AClaude Opus 4.796.25%Gemini 3 Flash (12/25) (Google), rank 8: 95.63%GGemini 3 Flash95.63%Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking) (Anthropic), rank 9: 95.63%AClaude Opus 4.695.63%GPT 5.4 Mini (OpenAI), rank 10: 95.63%OGPT 5.4 Mini95.63%Kimi K2.5 (Moonshot), rank 11: 95.63%KKimi K2.595.63%Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking) (Anthropic), rank 12: 95.42%AClaude Opus 4.595.42%Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic), rank 20: 92.29%A#20 Claude Sonne…92.29%
Accuracy
Share of problems answered correctly.

All scores

AIME scores, Anthropic models highlighted
RankModelProviderAccuracyPrice in / out ($/1M tokens)
1 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (02/26)Google98.13%$2 / $12
2 GPT 5.2OpenAI96.88%$1.75 / $14
3 Muse SparkMeta96.88%N/A
4 Gemini 3 Pro (11/25)Google96.68%$2 / $12
5 GPT 5.4 (xhigh)OpenAI96.67%$2.5 / $15
6 Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)xAI96.46%$2 / $6
7 Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic96.25%$5 / $25
8 Gemini 3 Flash (12/25)Google95.63%$0.5 / $3
9 Claude Opus 4.6 (Thinking)Anthropic95.63%$5 / $25
10 GPT 5.4 MiniOpenAI95.63%$0.75 / $4.5
Show 15 more rows
RankModelProviderAccuracyPrice in / out ($/1M tokens)
11 Kimi K2.5Moonshot95.63%$0.6 / $3
12 Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking)Anthropic95.42%$5 / $25
13 Qwen 3.6 PlusAlibaba94.58%$0.5 / $3
14 GPT 5OpenAI93.37%$1.25 / $10
15 GPT 5.1OpenAI93.33%$1.25 / $10
16 GLM 4.7Z.ai93.33%$0.6 / $2.2
17 GLM 4.6Z.ai92.71%$0.6 / $2.2
18 GPT OSS 120BOpenAI92.60%$0.15 / $0.6
19 Qwen 3.5 FlashAlibaba92.50%$0.1 / $0.4
20 Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic92.29%$3 / $15
21 Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)xAI91.88%$0.2 / $0.5
22 GLM 5.1Z.ai91.88%$1 / $3.2
23 GLM 5Z.ai91.67%$1 / $3.2
24 GPT 5 MiniOpenAI91.46%$0.25 / $2
25 Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning)xAI91.25%$0.2 / $0.5

Source: Vals AI leaderboard ↗

Best-ranked Anthropic model here: Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic). Try prompts for Claude →